Charlie Hebdo Republish Cartoon.

Charlie Hebdo Republish prophet Muhammad Cartoons lead the 2015 terrorist attack.

Decision by the French Satirical magazine to recirculate cartoons about The Prophet Muhammad and Islam that leads a deadly attack on France Peris and took 11 lives Killed in the attack.

Source: Google images

See History of Charlie Hebdo.

In 1960 Georges Bernier with partner Francois Cavanna started Magazine named Hara-Kiri aimed to write articles using cartoons on Politics, Celebrities, Goverment also religious content and make jokes on them. No single religion, but many religious content they had published.

It was started in 1789 with the French Revolution to publish on King and its cabinet talks via cartoon. Nut after revolution Monarchy was ended and a new era was started with Democracy introduced new government, Police, Banks with new reform. Still, this publication working and now Hara-Kiri started publishing on the new government.

What happened in the 1970 edition?

In 1970 Hara-Kiri banned because of two main reasons. First was making jokes about the Fire incident and second was made Joke on Ex-President death Charles André Joseph Marie de Gaulle, who was a French army officer and fought against Nazi Germany in world war II. From Banned Hara-Kiri changed its name and keep Charlie Hebdo. Again, Charlie Started making cartoons and wrote articles. But the magazine was not sold as it need to be sold to make status and the editor decided to stop Publication in 1981. 

What happened after Reopen?

After 11 years Charlie reopened and started its publication in under Editor(1992 to 2009)in Chief comedian Philippe Van. As editor in chief in 2006 many controversies started on publication related to Denmark's Newspaper Jyllands-Posten in 2005 published 10 cartoons on Prophet Muhamad and it was the trigger point to start a controversy in Charlie Hebdo. According to the Muslim religion, no one human can make a picture of Muhammad because it's out of human ability. Publisher said, "cartoon could be anything mean it can be terrorist or zealot or Talibani" But Jyllands-Posten cartoons were removed and tried to stop the controversy. 

In 2006 Charlie Hebdo Edition.

Charlie Hebdo Publish that controversial cartoons in their own Magazine with Headline"fundamentalist dominate Muhammad." and gave sudden spike in soelling of copies about 400000. The editor received threats from many fundamentalists and took him to court, but after hiring court acquitted him by saying Hebdo not against Muslims but against Islamic Fundamentalists. Also Hebdo Publish controversial cartoons on Jews as well even though Hebdo keep its unapologetic attitude

What Published in 2011 and 2015 Edition?

In 2011 again Publish but this time bombarded on Peris office but hopefully no one life lost. 

In 2012 America launch a movie-related Muslim named "The innocence of Muslims" and it shows many controversial scenes related to Muhammad and again controversy start in Middle East countries and now Muslim people defended its religion and attacked American, french embassies. Now this time Hebdo Publish its cartoon of nude Muhammed. 

After this French Goverment appeal to Publication to stop making controversial Cartoons but Hebdo didn't convince by saying it is against Freedom of Speech(Because France has freedom of speech in the constitution also France believe in Secularism)and publication believe in France law, not Saudi, Afghani or any Muslim country Law. 

Who was behind the 2015 terrorist attack?

This leads to the most dangerous reaction on 7th January 2015 with two terrorists keeping a fully loaded gun entered into the Charlie Hebdo Peris office and killed more than 12 people with Editor in Chief and famous cartoonist Charb and Cabu. This attack was done by Al-Qaeda Yaman Branch by saying they took revenge on Muhammad's insult and their friend killed another 4 people. In November ISIS did attack of Peris office and killed 130 people

Latest Update about Court trials.

And Now on 1st September 2020 again Charle Hebdo Publish Cartoon of Muhammad because from 2nd September Court trial start on the Prosecution of 14 people who helped terrorists in the 2015 Attack. Including 35-year-old Ali Reza Polat, who is being as the main link between the two attacks and believed to have had a key role in weapons supplier. According to the Magazine, "If they didn't publish so it would be sneaking corner." Trails have been delayed by four months because of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Your Opinion?

By the end who will decide what is right or wrong? Will it be decided by the Court or terrorist? Does freedom of speech mean to speak against religion?